File #: 20-0147    Version: 1 Name: resolution authorizing use of the RFP procurement method for wastewater flow monitoring services
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 1/28/2020 In control: Work Session
On agenda: 2/11/2020 Final action: 2/11/2020
Title: *Consideration Of Resolution 2020-06, A Resolution Authorizing The Use Of The Competitive Sealed Proposal Procurement Method For Selecting The Solution And Service Provider For Wastewater Flow Monitoring Services (Purchasing Office Procurement Solicitation No. 2020-021) For The Water Management Department.
Sponsors: Michelle Hatcher, Brian Goodwin
Attachments: 1. Res 2020-06 Competitive Sealed Proposal Method.Law Approved

DATE: January 28, 2020

TO: Board of Mayor and Aldermen

FROM: Eric Stuckey, City Administrator
Kristine Brock, Assistant City Administrator / CFO
Michelle Hatcher, PE, Director, Water Management Department
Brian Goodwin, PE, Assistant Director, Water Management Department
Brian Wilcox, Purchasing Manager

SUBJECT:
title
*Consideration Of Resolution 2020-06, A Resolution Authorizing The Use Of The Competitive Sealed Proposal Procurement Method For Selecting The Solution And Service Provider For Wastewater Flow Monitoring Services (Purchasing Office Procurement Solicitation No. 2020-021) For The Water Management Department.
body

Purpose
The purpose of this resolution would be to authorize the use of the competitive sealed proposal procurement method for selecting the solution and service provider for wastewater flow monitoring services for the Water Management Department for a term of award.

Background
Tennessee law and City ordinance both require the Board of Mayor and Aldermen to authorize use of the use of the competitive sealed proposal procurement method for choosing suppliers and service providers whenever the Board determines that the uses of competitive sealed bidding is either not practicable or not advantageous for the City.

For the planned procurement listed above, competitive sealed bidding is either not practicable or not advantageous to the City because qualifications, experience, and competence are more important than price in selecting the recommended solution and service provider, and because there is more than one solution to the needed purchase and the competitive sealed proposal procurement method will assist in selecting the responsive solution and responsible service provider that would best meet the City's needs.

Financial Impact
The financial impact of the procurement remains to be determined.

Options
Other procurement methods, including a solicitation for bids and a request for qualifications, would not be best suite...

Click here for full text