File #: 18-0750    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Contract/Agreement Status: Passed
File created: 7/13/2018 In control: Board of Mayor & Aldermen
On agenda: 8/14/2018 Final action: 8/14/2018
Title: Consideration of Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement (COF Contract No. 2017-0007) with Barge Design Solutions, Inc. for the Design of Intersection Improvements at East McEwen Drive and Cool Springs Boulevard for a Cost Increase Not-to-Exceed $52,300.00 (07/26/18 CIC 3-0)
Sponsors: Paul Holzen, Jonathan Marston
Attachments: 1. 2017-0007_Amend2_EMcEwenRndabt_with attachment.Law Approved.pdf

DATE: July 26, 2018

TO: Board of Mayor and Aldermen

FROM: Eric Stuckey, City Administrator
Paul Holzen, City Engineer/Director of Engineering
Jonathan Marston, Assistant Director of Engineering

SUBJECT:
title
Consideration of Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement (COF Contract No. 2017-0007) with Barge Design Solutions, Inc. for the Design of Intersection Improvements at East McEwen Drive and Cool Springs Boulevard for a Cost Increase Not-to-Exceed $52,300.00 (07/26/18 CIC 3-0)
body

Purpose
The purpose of this memo is to provide information to the Franklin Board of Mayor and Aldermen (BOMA) concerning Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Barge Design Solutions, Inc. for the design of intersection improvements at East McEwen Drive and Cool Springs Boulevard.

Background
On February 14, 2017, the BOMA approved a PSA with Barge Design Solutions, Inc. (f/k/a Barge Waggoner Sumner & Cannon, Inc.) to design improvements for the roundabout at East McEwen Drive and Cool Springs Boulevard/Oxford Glen Drive. The purpose of these improvements is to address operational issues at the roundabout that have occurred since its fully opening in 2014. On February 13, 2018, the BOMA approved Amendment No. 2 to the PSA. This amendment allowed for design of lighting improvements at the roundabout.

Barge Design Solutions, Inc. has completed and submitted a draft set of plans for review by City staff. During the review, staff became concerned about potential conflicts between existing utilities and the proposed improvements. Since the review of the draft plan set, staff has requested additional utility locates in an effort to better determine potential conflicts. The designer has compared this additional information with the design plans and has determined that substantial utility relocations will be required. Staff recommends allowing the roadway designer to perform the design of these utility relocations, as the...

Click here for full text