File #: 20-0163    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 2/3/2020 In control: Franklin Municipal Planning Commission
On agenda: 2/27/2020 Final action: 2/27/2020
Title: Consideration Of Resolution 2020-07: A Resolution Amending The Aspen Grove PUD Subdivision, Section O, Lot 4, Site Plan To Extend The Vested Rights, For The Property Located At The Intersection Of Cool Springs Boulevard And Windcross Court.
Attachments: 1. Vesting Extension Request Letter COF 6244, 2. EXHIBIT A MAP 6244 Vesting Extension, 3. Exhibit B COF 6244 - Aspen Grove, Sec O, Lot 4 (The Franklin at Legends View), 4. RES 2020-07 Vesting Extension Aspen Grove PUD Subdivision Section O Lot 4_with Exhibits_Law Approved

DATE: February 19, 2020

TO: Franklin Municipal Planning Commission

FROM: Amy Diaz-Barriga, Current Planning Supervisor
Emily Hunter, Director of Planning and Sustainability

Subject
title
Consideration Of Resolution 2020-07: A Resolution Amending The Aspen Grove PUD Subdivision, Section O, Lot 4, Site Plan To Extend The Vested Rights, For The Property Located At The Intersection Of Cool Springs Boulevard And Windcross Court.
body

Project Information
Applicant: Steve Akers, Integrous Architecture, LLC
Owner: P&K, LLC, rep: Eric Powers

Background/Staff Comments
The applicant is requesting an extension the vesting period for the site plan associated with the Aspen Grove PUD Subdivision, Section O, Lot 4. The Site Plan is not a part of a development plan, and was originally approved on the March 2017 Administrative Agenda. In terms of vesting, the site plan is considered the preliminary development document, as it was not associated with an overall development plan. Therefore, it has been vested for three years, or until March 2020. In order to retain it's vesting, the development must also record a final plat and commence site preparation and construction.

The applicant has not yet recorded a final plat, nor begun site preparation, and therefore is requesting an extension of three years to complete these two outstanding requirements. They are not requesting an extension to their overall 10-year vesting period. The project will still maintain a maximum vesting period of 10 years from its original approval date.

This site is particularly challenging due to the access easement required across this property, extending to the west. This site plan identified the appropriate location for the cross-access easement, as agreed upon by both the property owner and the adjacent property owner. Maintaining this agreed upon location is considered important to staff to ensure that cross connectivity to the traffic light at Windcross Court can be maintained...

Click here for full text