File #: 19-0681    Version: 1 Name: RES 2019-63 Condemnation
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 6/19/2019 In control: Work Session
On agenda: 6/25/2019 Final action: 6/25/2019
Title: *Consideration of Resolution 2019-63, A Resolution Authorizing Condemnation for 801 Crescent Centre Drive, Franklin, TN
Sponsors: Shauna Billingsley
Attachments: 1. 19-0681 2019-63 RES Condemnation_801 Crescent.Law Approved, 2. ROW Exhibit

DATE: June 19, 2019

TO: Board of Mayor and Aldermen

FROM: Eric Stuckey, City Administrator


SUBJECT:
title
*Consideration of Resolution 2019-63, A Resolution Authorizing Condemnation for 801 Crescent Centre Drive, Franklin, TN

body
Purpose
The purpose of this memo is to provide information to the Franklin Board of Mayor and Aldermen (BOMA) concerning the authorization of condemnation for the right of way at 801 Crescent Centre Drive.

Background
The City has determined that Carothers Parkway will be widened. While that project is not currently funded, when applications for new construction are presented to City staff, future improvements are considered. The owners of the property at issue here, 801 Crescent Centre Drive, presented a plan to engineering showing building inside the future Carothers Parkway. City staff met multiple times with the owners and their attorney. At each meeting, City staff explained that we would need the right of way in the future and are willing to purchase the right of way now. City staff asked that they owners have the property and the right of way appraised so we would be able to ascertain a purchase price.

Instead, the owners applied to planning, still showing the building in the future right of way, demanding that the item be placed on the agenda. Because we were still waiting on the requested appraisal and because the application was unchanged, it was not placed on the agenda. The property owners have still not provided the City with an appraisal, but instead, filed a Writ of Mandamus in the Williamson County Chancery Court against the City and Emily Hunter demanding that the City place the item on the agenda as provided (showing the building in the future right of way) because the City is demanding dedication of the property. This assertion is blatantly untrue. The City has offered to pay for the right of way, never demanding that it be dedicated. The City presents this resolution to authorize the ...

Click here for full text