File #: 18-0603    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 6/8/2018 In control: Work Session
On agenda: 6/26/2018 Final action: 6/26/2018
Title: *Consideration of Resolution 2018-50 to Award the FY 2019 On-Call Annual Contract for Concrete Work (COF Contract No. 2018-0038) to the Joint Venture between M.A.Y. Construction Company, Inc. and Tennessee Valley Paving Co., Inc.
Sponsors: Engineering
Attachments: 1. 2018-50 RES_OnCallAnnual_FY19_ConcreteWork.Law Approved.pdf, 2. C2018-0038_OnCallAnnual_Concrete_BidTabulation.pdf

DATE: June 21, 2018

TO: Board of Mayor and Aldermen

FROM: Eric Stuckey, City Administrator
Paul Holzen, City Engineer/Director of Engineering
Jonathan Marston, Assistant Director of Engineering

SUBJECT:
title
*Consideration of Resolution 2018-50 to Award the FY 2019 On-Call Annual Contract for Concrete Work (COF Contract No. 2018-0038) to the Joint Venture between M.A.Y. Construction Company, Inc. and Tennessee Valley Paving Co., Inc.
body

Purpose
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide information to the Franklin Board of Mayor and Aldermen (BOMA) concerning Resolution 2018-50 to award COF Contract No. 2018-0038 to the Joint Venture between M.A.Y. Construction Company, Inc. and Tennessee Valley Paving Co., Inc.

Background
The On-Call Annual Contract for Concrete Work may be utilized by any City department for the maintenance, modification, or construction of City infrastructure that utilizes concrete as its primary component (i.e. curb & gutter, sidewalk/trail, foundations, walls, etc.) In previous years, this particular contract was known as the On-Call Annual Contract for Concrete Curb and Sidewalk Repairs, and was used exclusively for the maintenance by the Streets Department. The reformatting of this contract and its authorizing resolution will all City departments to utilize this annual contract if needed.

On May 11, 2018, the City received sealed bids for this contract. Upon initial review, the apparent low bidder appeared to be Pavement Restoration, Inc. (PRI) with a bid price of $655,500.00. A more thorough review revealed that the apparent low bidder could not honor the unit price, as bid, for one of the larger item contained within the bid. Unfortunately, an error in the listed bid quantity indirectly led the low bidder to make an incorrect assumption when developing his bid price. However, the second, apparent low bidder, a Joint Venture between M.A.Y. Construction Company, Inc. and Tennessee Valley Co., Inc. bid the con...

Click here for full text