File #: 14-613    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Report Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 11/5/2014 In control: Work Session
On agenda: 11/25/2014 Final action:
Title: Presentation of Stormwater Construction Site Inspection Utilizing iPads
Sponsors: Paul Holzen
Attachments: 1. SKMBT_C654e14111018010
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
DATE: November 11, 2014

TO: Board of Mayor and Aldermen

FROM: Eric Stuckey, City Administrator
Vernon Gerth, ACA - Community Development
Paul Holzen, Director of Engineering
Jeff Willoughby, Stormwater Coordinator

SUBJECT:
title
Presentation of Stormwater Construction Site Inspection Utilizing iPads

body
Purpose
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an overview to the Board of Mayor and Aldermen (BOMA) on how City staff is utilizing technology to implement construction site compliance inspections.

Background
In response to the 1987 Amendments to the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) developed regulations for urbanized areas with a population over 10,000. The EPA's phase II final rule requires National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit coverage for stormwater discharges from the City of Franklin's municipal separate storm sewer system. Part of this permit requires the City to develop, implement and enforce a construction site stormwater runoff control program. As part of this program, the City is required to inspect construction sites at least once per month to ensure construction site pollutants are controlled onsite and prevent them from impairing our water resources. Currently, 100% of our streams are impaired due to siltation associated with development activities.

The City currently has 100 active construction site and only two inspectors. This requires each inspector to visit 50 sites per month to ensure compliance with our National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. In the past these inspections were done utilizing a paper forms and a digital camera. Following the inspection, staff would return the office and prepare a formal inspection report that would then be emailed or mailed to the contractor and property owners. This procedure was very inefficient making i...

Click here for full text