File #: 15-0387    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Contract/Agreement Status: Passed
File created: 4/9/2015 In control: Board of Mayor & Aldermen
On agenda: 5/12/2015 Final action: 5/12/2015
Title: Consideration of DRAFT Resolution 2015-23, A Resolution Awarding the Construction Contract (COF Contract No. 2014-0303) for the Ralston Creek at Cheswicke Farms Stream Restoration Project to Viking Products, Inc. in the amount of $89,061.00 (CIC 04/23/15 4-0)
Sponsors: Engineering, Paul Holzen
Attachments: 1. 2015-23 Resolution_Final

DATE: April 23, 2015

TO: Board of Mayor and Aldermen

FROM: Eric Stuckey, City Administrator
David Parker, City Engineer/CIP Executive
Paul Holzen, Director of Engineering
Jeff Willoughby, Stormwater Coordinator
Jonathan Marston, Staff Engineer 3

SUBJECT:
title
Consideration of DRAFT Resolution 2015-23, A Resolution Awarding the Construction Contract (COF Contract No. 2014-0303) for the Ralston Creek at Cheswicke Farms Stream Restoration Project to Viking Products, Inc. in the amount of $89,061.00 (CIC 04/23/15 4-0)
body

Purpose
The purpose of this memo is to provide information to the Franklin Board of Mayor and Aldermen (BOMA) concerning DRAFT Resolution 2015-23 to award the construction contract for the Ralston Creek at Cheswicke Farms Stream Restoration Project to Viking, Products, Inc.

Background
The City of Franklin evaluated Ralston Creek in 2010 and identified it as a stream in need of restoration work in order to keep it off the list of impaired streams in Tennessee. To date, Ralston Creek, a tributary of the impaired Harpeth River has not been assessed by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC). This particular reach of Ralston Creek was identified as a good segment on which to enhance the stream buffer, since it is located within the common area of the Cheswicke Farms subdivision.

Upon further evaluation, the City decided that the stream was also in need of restoration work beyond a simple buffer enhancement. The stream has a concrete swale underneath portions of it and lacks definition, especially in the bend, where another channel enters the stream from the west. Additional conditions for which mitigation is necessary include stream bank erosion, improper pattern and profile, improper elevation changes at the upper and lower tie-ins, trash and debris, and lack of riparian buffer.

The purpose of this project is to restore the subject stream to a more aesthetically pleasing and s...

Click here for full text