File #: 14-582    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Contract/Agreement Status: Passed
File created: 10/31/2014 In control: Board of Mayor & Aldermen
On agenda: 11/25/2014 Final action: 11/25/2014
Title: Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with EG&G (a Division of CT Consultants, Inc.)(COF Contract No. 2011-0060) for Additional Engineering Design Services on the Hillsboro Road Improvements Project, Phases 1 and 2 . (11-12-14 CIP 3-0)
Sponsors: David Parker
Attachments: 1. COF 2011-0060 Hillsboro Road EG&G Amendment 1 PSA, 2. COF 2011-0060 Hillsboro Road EG&G PSA Amend 1 PSA EXHIBIT A

DATE: October 31, 2014

TO: Board of Mayor and Aldermen

FROM: Eric Stuckey, City Administrator
David Parker, City Engineer/CIP Executive
Paul Holzen, Director of Engineering
William G. Banks, Staff Engineer I

SUBJECT:
title
Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with EG&G (a Division of CT Consultants, Inc.)(COF Contract No. 2011-0060) for Additional Engineering Design Services on the Hillsboro Road Improvements Project, Phases 1 and 2 . (11-12-14 CIP 3-0)
body
Purpose
The purpose of this memorandum is to bring forward to the Board of Mayor and Aldermen (BOMA) a proposal from EG&G (a Division of CT Consultants, Inc.) to modify their existing Professional Services Agreement (COF Contract 2011-0060) for the Hillsboro Road Improvements Project, Phases 1 and 2.

Background
On April 26, 2011, the Board of Mayor and Aldermen approved a Professional Services Agreement (COF Contract 2011-0060) with EG&G for Engineering Design Services for the Streetscape, Street Lighting, and Electrical Distribution items on the Hillsboro Road Improvements Project, Phases 1 and 2.

This Amendment #1 includes an additional fee of $33,500 for the following:
1. The negotiated fee/hourly rates have increased since this contract was negotiated in 2011;
2. Increased labor incurred due to stops and starts on the project, including project coordination with sub-consultants and other consultants;
3. Additional coordination with utility companies for relocation of overhead utilities;
4. Revisions to distribution plans due to new construction, connection/service changes made by property owners, easement negotiations, and Phase 1 construction coordination;
5. Revisions to distribution plans to underground services to properties that were previously to remain overhead;
6. Revisions to quantities and pay items due to above changes;
7. Additional splitting of quantities for City vs. State funded areas.

See the attach...

Click here for full text