File #: 15-0892    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 9/23/2015 In control: Board of Mayor & Aldermen
On agenda: 11/10/2015 Final action: 11/10/2015
Title: Consideration of Resolution 2015-20, A Resolution To Authorize The City Administrator To Execute Procurement Contracts And Agreements On Behalf Of The City After An Award Has Been Made Pursuant To City Policy. (10/08/15 Finance 3-0)
Sponsors: Russ Truell, Kristen Corn, Brian Wilcox
Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 2015-20, approved by Law 2015.10.28, 2. Resolution No. 2015-20, approved by Law 2015.10.01, 3. Resolution No. 2015-20 comparison of 2015.09.24.0733 and 2015.10.13.1207 versions

 

DATE:                                                               November 3, 2015

 

TO:                                          Board of Mayor and Aldermen

 

FROM:                                          Eric Stuckey, City Administrator

                                          Russell Truell, Assistant City Administrator / CFO

                                          Kristen Corn, Assistant City Attorney

                                          Brian Wilcox, Purchasing Manager

 

SUBJECT:                                          

title

Consideration of Resolution 2015-20, A Resolution To Authorize The City Administrator To Execute Procurement Contracts And Agreements On Behalf Of The City After An Award Has Been Made Pursuant To City Policy. (10/08/15 Finance 3-0)

body

 

Purpose

The purpose of this proposed resolution is to streamline and expedite the process of executing procurement contracts and agreements on behalf of the City after an award has been made pursuant to City policy.

 

Background

Currently, procurement contracts and agreements valued at $25,000 or less may be executed by the City Administrator and then reported to the Board of Mayor and Aldermen, while those valued more than $25,000 are to be executed by the Mayor after consideration and approval by the Board of Mayor and Aldermen.  Pricing and a recommendation for award of procurements valued more than $25,000 and resulting from the City’s own competitive process is presented for review and approval by the Board of Mayor and Aldermen.  This practice would not change and is viewed by staff to be an important component of the City’s transparency in public procurement.

 

Often, however, procurements valued at more than $25,000, regardless of pricing and the type of competitive process, necessitate a contract or agreement.  In the opinion of staff, asking the Board of Mayor and Aldermen to pass judgment on procurement contracts and agreements valued at more than $25,000 when the contract or agreement is not yet in final form but pricing and a recommendation for award has already been approved by the Board of Mayor and Aldermen serves to delay the expeditious execution of the purchase.   The same is true when pricing and the awarded vendor are established by means of an alternative procurement method approved by City policy.  A recent example of the former is the purchase of the dump truck for the Streets Department; an example of the latter is the purchase of bulk de-icing rock salt for clearing roads of snow and ice.

 

Resolution 2015-20, if approved, would authorize the City Administrator “to negotiate and execute procurement contracts and agreements, including those that do pertain to the design and/or construction of new infrastructure and facilities as well as those that do not, but are valued at more than Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00), on behalf of the City of Franklin, Tennessee, whenever an award to a particular vendor, supplier, service provider or contractor has been made pursuant to City policy; provided the award is for a particular product, service and/or scope of work, and provided the award is for an established total amount or established unit pricing, and provided the contract or agreement is reported to the Board of Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Franklin, Tennessee at its next available meeting.”

 

Financial Impact

Staff is not aware that the increased delegated authority proposed above would have a negative financial impact on the City.  Staff anticipates that the increased delegated authority proposed above would serve to expedite the conduct of the City’s business for contracts and agreements valued more than $25,000.

 

Options

The Board of Mayor and Aldermen has the option of declining to increase the delegated authority proposed above.

 

Recommendation

rec

Staff recommends that the Board of Mayor and Aldermen approve Resolution 2015-20.